<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Rumor About the Dann Affair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.naugblog.com/2008/05/05/another-rumor-about-the-dann-affair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.naugblog.com/2008/05/05/another-rumor-about-the-dann-affair/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.naugblog.com/2008/05/05/another-rumor-about-the-dann-affair/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naugblog.com/?p=146#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>You pose an interesting situation if fleshed out:

1. Small question: what did Guv know and when did he know it?

2. Big question: is it legal for Guv to use state funds (security detail) to conduct private, political investigation on a top statewide officer to dig up dirt and presumably to use that dirt against the officer or for his own party's or candidate purposes?

Using state money to launch investigations into a private sexual affair sounds like a misuse of funds. I don't care if he wanted dirt to out Dann, use it against Dann, or prevent its use against his own administration or party. It's private Partisan activity on the state's dime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pose an interesting situation if fleshed out:</p>
<p>1. Small question: what did Guv know and when did he know it?</p>
<p>2. Big question: is it legal for Guv to use state funds (security detail) to conduct private, political investigation on a top statewide officer to dig up dirt and presumably to use that dirt against the officer or for his own party&#8217;s or candidate purposes?</p>
<p>Using state money to launch investigations into a private sexual affair sounds like a misuse of funds. I don&#8217;t care if he wanted dirt to out Dann, use it against Dann, or prevent its use against his own administration or party. It&#8217;s private Partisan activity on the state&#8217;s dime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NixGuy.com &#187; Dann Update</title>
		<link>http://www.naugblog.com/2008/05/05/another-rumor-about-the-dann-affair/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>NixGuy.com &#187; Dann Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naugblog.com/?p=146#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>[...] crimes that he didn&#8217;t think we&#8217;re all that big of a deal.  Via PainDealer.  And if Naugle is correct, Strickland has been sitting on information for awhile now. Even if Naugle is not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] crimes that he didn&#8217;t think we&#8217;re all that big of a deal.  Via PainDealer.  And if Naugle is correct, Strickland has been sitting on information for awhile now. Even if Naugle is not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.317 seconds -->
