Comments on: NAUGBLOG EXCLUSIVE: Interview with Assistant AG Jennifer Urban

By: No sympathy-Not a Fan

No sympathy-Not a Fan — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:26:43 +0000

How do Jenn and the others expect the wives and families to get “whole” again after sleeping with their husbands, fathers and sons etc.: a/k/a middle aged, married, obnoxious pigs. How long was she being harrassed by Leo? When did it start and did it all become harrasment when Leo was no longer available and could not help her with her very shotty career? What were some of the perks Jenn and how will you explain those? “B–W Job” welll done? I guess “claiming” you only slept with one married man is okay? True family values!
Your parents must be very proud of thier daughter, not sure this is what they had in mind when they sent you off to Law School!
You are a drunk and a tramp and should learn to keep your mounth shut like your good friend Jessica. It’s been said that you were stalking Leo and Tony?? That can’t possibly be true can it? You better be careful, this could take you some place you don’t want to go. When you play with fire you get burned!
Harrasement, I think not. Show me the money and save face. (and not such a petty one at that).

By: Administrative Assistant

Administrative Assistant — Sat, 31 May 2008 11:07:26 +0000

“Nothing surprises me when it comes to the government wasting money.”

Yes I agree.

By: Dion

Dion — Sat, 24 May 2008 23:04:58 +0000

Why don’t you two just go get a room?

2 married men, 2 single women….an alcoholic, labor union “mobster”, that can’t drive, sidekick…and two hapless victims…..

Sounds like an NBC sitcom more that an AG office.

This girl can’t be believed on any level if anything BECAUSE she is friends with lying dirtbag Utovich. “Birds of a feather flock together” and this isn’t an innocent helpless lamb. She is an attorney, that is savvy and knows more about lying and avoiding the truth more than most of us will ever know.

Just because she is into self preservation over loyalty doesn’t mean she is “clean.”

She is a rotten four-flusher. Stop swapping spit with her or you might end up with your pants down, computer confiscated….sitting in the IG’s office, like a school boy caught by the principal, looking up skirts, under the monkey bars at recess.

Look closer, IF the Blackberry was recovered then WHERE is the FREAKIN’ TV? Maybe it will turn up at a party mysteriously on someones kitchen counter on campus.

It should be obvious that IF the Blackberry was stolen, then ANY alterations, deletions or destruction of evidence would be easier explained IF it were out of her possession for a period of time.

Alterations or deletions of a Blackberry IN her possession would draw attention and consequences but IF Blackberry was “stolen” then when it shows up with NO EVIDENCE on it, that could be attributed to “thieves” and the time when she “didn’t know” were it was. At least the IG will think of this.

WHERE IS HE FREAKIN’ TV??????

By: Robb

Robb — Thu, 22 May 2008 20:03:30 +0000

Nothing surprises me when it comes to the government wasting money.

By: conservacrat

conservacrat — Thu, 22 May 2008 19:00:09 +0000

I think most people would be surprised by the high number–and low to middling rank–of state employees issued Blackberries in various state agencies.

By: The $500 question

The $500 question — Thu, 22 May 2008 18:10:35 +0000

Here is the question that I’d love to hear an answer to Ms. Urban.

The Ohio AG employs well over 700 attorneys. Of those attorneys, only a select few are issued blackberries by the state. From what I understand, about 40-50 attorneys get them.

Why does a 3rd year AAG get a blackberry from Ohio?

By: anonymous

anonymous — Thu, 22 May 2008 14:20:01 +0000

jessica’s work history includes getting on her hands and knees, preferably under someone’s desk and then you fill in the blanks.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Thu, 22 May 2008 12:14:59 +0000

In response to “The Bad Guy”…if the CLE was to be offered for ethics, professionalism, and substance abuse, then I am sure that Marc and Leo would benefit by attending with Jennifer. Maybe we should add immorality and adultery to the CLE as well. I am sure that would fulfill the requirements for those involved.

Also, there has been mention of Jennifer’s work history in her interview as well as the blog responses, just curious as to what Jessica’s work history entails.

By: Wow.

Wow. — Thu, 22 May 2008 11:53:28 +0000

There is no love lost between me and Marc Dann’s trainwreck of an office, but some of the comments here are just beyond the pale. Conservatives are supposed to have a set of morals and values. What the hell is wrong with some of you people?

By: The Bad Guy

The Bad Guy — Thu, 22 May 2008 11:31:01 +0000

By the way, I’m assuming the CLE wasn’t one to fulfill the ethics, professionalism, and substance abuse requirements.